MPT South Eastern

Resolution details

UNANIMOUSLY RESOLVED that:
a. The application for rezoning in terms of Section 42(a) of the City of Cape Town Municipal Planning By-Law, 2015 of Remainder Stellenbosch Farm 996, Faure from agricultural zone to subdivisional area overlay zone to allow for residential, community, utility, commercial, public road and open space uses, BE APPROVED in terms of Section 98(b)iii of the City of Cape Town Municipal Planning By-Law, 2015, subject to conditions in the attached Annexure A.

b. The application for subdivision in terms of Section 42(d) of the City of Cape Town Municipal Planning By-Law, 2015 of Remainder Stellenbosch Farm 996, Faure, in accordance with plan no 4.008 revision 3, dated 11/09/2018, BE APPROVED in terms of Section 98(b)iii of the Municipal Planning By-Law, 2015 subject to conditions in the attached Annexure A.


c. The application for implementation of the subdivision in phases in terms of Section 42(e) of the City of Cape Town Municipal Planning By-Law, 2015 Remainder Stellenbosch Farm 996, Faure in accordance with plan no 4.008 revision 4/phases dated 11/09/2018, BE APPROVED in terms of Section 98(b)iii of the City of Cape Town Municipal Planning By-Law, 2015 subject to conditions in the attached Annexure A.

REASONS FOR DECISION
The MPT APPROVED the application for the reasons set out in the Planner’s Report and agreed to amend:

7.1.1 The proposal is consistent with the Municipal Spatial Development Framework and with the Khayelitsha / Mitchells Plain and Greater Blue Downs SDP, 2014 and the applicable policies.

7.1.4 The proposed development would result in sustainability through social and economic upliftment of the larger area.

Annexure A:
Add to point 2 – Development Management:
- That a consolidated Urban Design and Site Development Plan is prepared for portions 2367, 2368, 2371 and 2413 which shall demonstrate how the development and urban design shall contribute to the development of the community and showing how the development can be integrated with the surrounding residential areas, and submitted to the duly authorized Official for approval

- That the mix of unit types within the framework of the available subsidies need to respond to the different socio-economic groups

- That the mix of typologies need to address, within the limits of, and utilizing, a wide range of the subsidy instruments available, a broader socio-economic mix which could include GAP and market related housing

Conditions 2.3.1 and 2.3.2 will be redone and circulated to the panel for approval.

FOR INFORMATION: ALLIE / HANEKOM